Pengantar Taksonomi Pendidikan Fisika : Konsep, Perkembangan, dan Implementasi
Kata Kunci:
Taksonomi Pendidikan, Taxonomy, Education, Learning, Assessment, PenilaianSinopsis
Pengantar Taksonomi Pendidikan Fisika: Konsep, Perkembangan, dan Implementasi adalah sebuah buku yang dirancang untuk membantu para pendidik, dosen, dan mahasiswa kependidikan memahami serta mengaplikasikan berbagai model taksonomi pendidikan secara sistematis dan praktis. Buku ini lahir dari refleksi, observasi, dan pengalaman langsung penulis dalam dunia pendidikan, khususnya dalam mengintegrasikan taksonomi sebagai alat bantu merancang pembelajaran yang tidak hanya berorientasi pada pengetahuan, tetapi juga pada pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kritis, kreatif, dan kolaboratif. Buku ini mengupas secara mendalam perkembangan taksonomi pendidikan dari Taksonomi Bloom klasik, revisinya, hingga pendekatan-pendekatan modern seperti Taksonomi SOLO, Wiggins, Fink, dan Marzano. Setiap bab disusun dengan pendekatan teoritis dan aplikatif, lengkap dengan contoh penerapannya dalam pembelajaran fisika, yang dikenal sebagai salah satu mata pelajaran dengan kebutuhan penilaian yang kompleks dan multidimensi. Dengan cakupan yang luas, buku ini juga memaparkan bagaimana taksonomi kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotor dapat saling melengkapi dalam perancangan tujuan, strategi pengajaran, dan asesmen pembelajaran. Pendekatan integratif ini disajikan untuk menjawab tantangan pembelajaran abad ke-21 yang menuntut fleksibilitas, relevansi, dan kebermaknaan dalam proses pendidikan. Tidak hanya menjadi sumber pengetahuan konseptual, buku ini juga merupakan panduan praktis dalam merancang pembelajaran yang inklusif dan transformatif. Melalui kombinasi kajian literatur, studi kasus, serta contoh asesmen autentik, pembaca diajak untuk memahami dinamika perkembangan taksonomi pendidikan sekaligus mengaplikasikannya dalam konteks nyata di kelas. Buku ini diharapkan dapat menjadi kontribusi berarti dalam peningkatan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia, serta menjadi referensi penting bagi pengembangan penelitian dan praktik pembelajaran yang berorientasi pada pengembangan potensi peserta didik secara holistik.
Unduhan
Referensi
Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 145–170.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
Agarkar, S., & Brock, R. (2017). Learning theories in science education. In Science education: An international course companion (pp. 93-103). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
Agarkar, S. C. (2019). Influence of learning theories on science education. Resonance, 24(8), 847-859.
Anand, B., Mishra, I., Beri, G., & Chaudhary, K. L. (2024). Types of learning: Domains of learning–Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor, learning theories, experiential learning. Extension methods, ICT and educational technology, 53-82.
Anderson, L. W., & Sosniak, L. A. (Eds.). (1994). Bloom's taxonomy: A forty-year retrospective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching, 12(05), 2023.
Biggs, J., & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman.
Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive science and science education. American psychologist, 41(10), 1123.
Couch, B. A., Brown, T. L., Schelpat, T. J., Graham, M. J., & Knight, J. K. (2015). Scientific teaching: Defining a taxonomy of observable practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar9.
Dave, R. (1967). Psychomotor domain. International Conference of Educational Testing.
Fallahi, C. R. (2008). Redesign of a life span development course using Fink's taxonomy. Teaching of Psychology, 35(3), 169-175.
Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 41(4), 47-56.
Gagne, R. M. (1988). Mastery learning and instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1(1), 7-18.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Harrow, A. J. (1977). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: a guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: David McKay.
Heckman, R. T. (1993). Cognitive Science, Learning Theory, and Technical Education. International Conference on Teaching Excellence and Conference of Administrators, 1-22.
Hoque, M. E. (2016). Three domains of learning: Cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The Journal of EFL Education and Research, 2(2), 45-52.
Irvine, J. (2017). A comparison of revised Bloom and Marzano’s new taxonomy of learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 33, 1–10.
Irvine, J. (2021). Taxonomies in education: Overview, comparison, and future directions. Journal of Education and Development, 5(2), 1–10.
Jonassen, D. H. (2007). A taxonomy of meaningful learning. Educational Technology, 30-35.
Killian, L. J. (2024). Improve Learning With The Significant Learning Taxonomy. A Publication of ACBSP, 13.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Kunandar, K. (2013). Penilaian autentik (Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 16-18.
Magdalena, I., Islami, N. F., Rasid, E. A., & Diasty, N. T. (2020). Tiga ranah taksonomi Bloom dalam pendidikan. EDISI, 2(1), 132–139.
Mahmudi, I., Athoillah, Z. M., Wicaksono, B. E., & Kusuma, R. A. (2022). Taksonomi hasil belajar menurut Benyamin S. Bloom. Universitas Darussalam Gontor.
Marton, F. (1976). What does it take to learn? Some implications of an alternative view of learning. In N. Entwistle (Ed.), Strategies for research and development in higher education (pp. 32–43). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitzlinger.
Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).
Marzano, R., & Kendall, J. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (Eds.). (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Corwin Press.
McCormack, A. J., & Yager, R. E. (1989). A New Taxonomy of Science Education. Science Teacher, 56(2), 47-48.
Molas, A., & Winkler, R. D. (2023). Fink’s taxonomy of significant learning.
Newton, G., & Martin, E. (2013). Blooming, SOLO taxonomy, and phenomenography as assessment strategies in undergraduate science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(2), 78-90.
Ormell, C. P. (1974). Bloom's taxonomy and the objectives of education. Educational Research, 17(1), 3-18.
Paul, R. M., Jazayeri, Y., Behjat, L., & Potter, M. (2023). Design of an integrated project-based learning curriculum: Analysis through fink’s taxonomy of significant learning. IEEE Transactions on Education, 66(5), 457-467.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Richardson, G. (2005). Craft Guilds and Christianity in Late-Medieval England: A Rational-Choice Analysis. Rationality and Society, 17(2), 139–189.
Savickiene, I. (2010). Conception of Learning Outcomes in the Bloom's Taxonomy Affective Domain. Quality of Higher Education, 7, 37-59.
Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Simpson, E. J. (1966). The Classification of Educational Objectives, Psychomotor Domain (Vocational and Technical Education Grant No. OE 5-85-104). Washington DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare
Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. In M. T. Rainer (Ed.), Contributions of behavioral science to instructional technology: The psychomotor domain (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Gryphon Press, Prentice Hall.
Smith, E. L. (2013). Using a new taxonomy for significant learning in the theory
classroom. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy E-Journal, 1(2).
Subagis, J., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen psikomotorik penilaian psikomotor pada penggunaan Lego dalam mata pelajaran matematika sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 11–23.
Tomei, L. A. (2005). Domains of Teaching. In Taxonomy for the Technology Domain (pp. 1-21). IGI Global.
Utami, A.D. (2020). Level pemahaman konsep komposisi fungsi berdasar taksonomi SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes). Banyumas, Indonesia: CV. Pena Persada.
Vargas, J. H., Ojeda, E. C. C., Zapata, C. A. C., Flores, K. A. A., Vela, J. A. H., & Espinoza, Y. E. D. (2024). Analysis of Significant Learning in Higher Education: Usefulness of Fink's Taxonomy: A Systematic Review. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 7(S7), 1341.
Vick, M., & Garvey, M. P. (2011). Levels of Cognitive Processes in a Non-Formal Science Education Program: Scouting's Science Merit Badges and the Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(2), 173-190.
Wilson, L. O. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s taxonomy revised understanding the new version of Bloom’s taxonomy. The Second Principle, 1(1), 1-8.
Yager, R. E. (1982). What research says to the science teacher. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Yager, R. E., & McCormack, A. J. (1989). Assessing teaching/learning successes in multiple domains of science and science education.
Yaw, P. W., Matore, M. E. E. M., Handayani, T., & Handayani, L. (2025). Trends in the development of Fink’s taxonomy: a systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(4), 1883-1893.
